In a front-page Washington Post story, Professor Carl Bogus says NRA money took the "individual right to possess a firearm" from the fringes to the mainstream.

Upcoming Events

Open Door Speaker Series

Commencement

Open Door Speaker Series

Commencement

Reception in Memory of Professor Robert B. Kent '01H
APR
29
4:30 pm - 6:00 pm
RWU School of Law | Bristol, Rhode Island
Providence Law Alumni Networking Reception
APR
30
5:30 pm - 7:00 pm
GPub, 61 Orange Street, Providence, RI
Accepted Students Day
MAY
11
9:45 am - 1:30 pm
RWU Law, 10 Metacom Avenue, Bristol, RI 02809
School of Law Commencement
MAY
15
1:00 pm - 3:00 pm
RWU School of Law, Bristol, RI
Pro Bon Collaboarate Cocktail Reception
MAY
28
5:30 pm - 7:00 pm
One Citizens Plaza Rotunda, Providence, RI

Trending@RWULaw

04/14/2015
By Dennis Esposito
As I sit here in sunny Mexico, I ask myself: Why do I go back?  Here’s why: I am reflecting upon my longstanding relationship with the Marine Affairs Institute...  Seventeen years and...


Affordable Excellence at RWU LAW

Archives

Newsroom

Bogus: NRA Money Shaped Gun Law

In a front-page Washington Post story, Professor Carl Bogus says NRA money took the "individual right to possess a firearm" from the fringes to the mainstream.

From the Washington Post: "NRA money helped reshape gun law" by Peter Finn

Second AmendmentMarch 13, 2013: In 1977 ... it was ... a wacky notion: that the Constitution confers an individual right to possess a firearm. ...

More than 35 years later, no one is laughing. In 2008, the Supreme Court endorsed for the first time an individual’s right to own a gun in the case of District of Columbia v. Heller. ...

For proponents of stricter gun control, the NRA’s encouragement of favorable legal scholarship has been a mark of its strategic, patient advocacy.

“I think this was one of the most successful attempts to change the law and to change a legal paradigm in history,” said Carl T. Bogus, a professor at Roger Williams University School of Law in Rhode Island and the editor of “The Second Amendment in Law and History,” a collection of essays that challenges the interpretation of the individual right. “They were thinking strategically. I don’t think the NRA funds scholarship out of academic interest. I think the NRA funds something because it has a political objective.”

Professor Carl Bogus... Before the Heller decision, the Supreme Court and lower courts had interpreted the language as “preserving the authority of the states to maintain militias,” according to a Congressional Research Service analysis.

“It was a settled question, and the overwhelming consensus, bordering on unanimity, was that the Second Amendment granted a collective right” enjoyed by the states, not individuals, Bogus said. Under this interpretation, the Constitution provides no right for an individual to possess a firearm. ...

For full story, click here.