Professor Carl Bogus speaks to the Providence Journal about why the George Zimmerman verdict was the only possible outcome, in light of the evidence.

Upcoming Events

Secrets & Scandals

Secrets & Scandals

A Day In The Life of Congressman David Cicilline
OCT
08
12:00 pm - 1:00 pm
Appellate Courtroom 283
Info Session for Prospective Students
OCT
10
8:30 am - 12:00 pm
RWU Law, 10 Metacom Avenue, Bristol, RI 02809
Marine Affairs Joint Degree Informational Meeting
OCT
17
12:00 pm - 1:00 pm
David A. Logan Conference Room - Law 244
Jeopardy!
OCT
17
7:00 pm - 10:00 pm
Appellate Courtroom 283
Movie Screening: Inequality for all
OCT
21
6:00 pm - 9:00 pm
Room 276

Trending@RWULaw

09/26/2014
By Larry Ritchie
Keeping abreast of the criminal justice and evidence areas of the law can be a time-consuming proposition for a law professor.  Of course, I regularly read the Criminal Law Reporter and other...


Affordable Excellence at RWU LAW

Archives

Newsroom

Bogus on Zimmerman Acquittal

Professor Carl Bogus speaks to the Providence Journal about why the George Zimmerman verdict was the only possible outcome, in light of the evidence.

From the PROVIDENCE JOURNAL: In Providence, marchers denounce verdict in Trayvon Martin’s killing,” by Philip Marcelo, Journal Staff Writer

Professor Carl BogusPROVIDENCE, July 15, 2013 — The day after George Zimmerman was found not guilty in the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin in Florida, more than 150 residents and activists rallied and marched through Providence’s South Side in protest Sunday evening. […]

But Carl T. ‍Bogus, a law professor at Roger Williams University in Bristol, said the outcome was the only possible one, in light of the evidence.

The Florida prosecutors, he said, simply failed to prove Zimmerman’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

“The available evidence didn’t meet that standard. In fact, it wasn’t even close,” he said via e-mail. “Do I think that George Zimmerman was probably responsible for an innocent boy’s death? I do. Yet, had I been on the jury, I would have had to vote to acquit.” [...]

For full story, click here.