Professor Carl Bogus speaks to the Providence Journal about why the George Zimmerman verdict was the only possible outcome, in light of the evidence.

Upcoming Events

Attorney General Summit

Orientation

Attorney General Summit

Orientation

18th Annual Rhode Island Attorney General Open Government Summit
JUL
29
8:30 am - 12:00 pm
RWU Law, Bristol, RI
LSAT Free Practice Test
AUG
05
10:00 am - 1:30 pm
RWU Law-- Appellate Courtroom (Room 283), 10 Metacom Avenue, Bristol, RI 02809
Incoming Student Orientation
AUG
10
All Day
RWU School of Law
Public Interest Potluck
SEP
09
4:30 pm - 6:30 pm
Law School Bistro
The 5th Annual Professor Anthony J. Santoro Business Law Lecture Series
SEP
22
5:00 pm - 5:00 pm
Omni Hotel Providence

Trending@RWULaw

06/17/2016
By Dean Michael J. Yelnosky
Last Sunday, when the scope of the tragedy at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando began to emerge, I sent the following email to the student body: Tragically, once again Americans are mourning the loss of...


Affordable Excellence at RWU LAW

Archives

Newsroom

Bogus on Zimmerman Acquittal

Professor Carl Bogus speaks to the Providence Journal about why the George Zimmerman verdict was the only possible outcome, in light of the evidence.

From the PROVIDENCE JOURNAL: In Providence, marchers denounce verdict in Trayvon Martin’s killing,” by Philip Marcelo, Journal Staff Writer

Professor Carl BogusPROVIDENCE, July 15, 2013 — The day after George Zimmerman was found not guilty in the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin in Florida, more than 150 residents and activists rallied and marched through Providence’s South Side in protest Sunday evening. […]

But Carl T. ‍Bogus, a law professor at Roger Williams University in Bristol, said the outcome was the only possible one, in light of the evidence.

The Florida prosecutors, he said, simply failed to prove Zimmerman’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

“The available evidence didn’t meet that standard. In fact, it wasn’t even close,” he said via e-mail. “Do I think that George Zimmerman was probably responsible for an innocent boy’s death? I do. Yet, had I been on the jury, I would have had to vote to acquit.” [...]

For full story, click here.