Professor Carl Bogus speaks to the Providence Journal about why the George Zimmerman verdict was the only possible outcome, in light of the evidence.

Upcoming Events

santoro-business-law-lecture-series

Roger on the Block

santoro-business-law-lecture-series

Roger on the Block

Open Door Speaker Series: "How to Manage a Corporate Client's Crisis”
SEP
08
5:00 pm - 7:30 pm
RWU School of Law, Bristol | Room 262
Info Session for Prospective Students
SEP
09
9:30 am - 1:00 pm
RWU Law, 10 Metacom Avenue, Bristol, RI 02809
Roger on the Block
SEP
10
1:00 pm - 5:00 pm
One Empire Street, Providence
Surviving the Storm 2016: Employee Benefit Compliance & Employment Law Update
SEP
15
8:00 am - 12:30 pm
RWU School of Law, Providence Campus
Public Interest Potluck
SEP
16
12:00 am - 12:00 am
Law School Bistro

Trending@RWULaw

08/23/2016
By Linn F. Freedman
I have the privilege of teaching the Privacy Law class at RWU Law. It is a required course for the school's Joint Masters in Cybersecurity/Juris Doctor program, which is, to my knowledge, the only...


Affordable Excellence at RWU LAW

Archives

Newsroom

Bogus on Zimmerman Acquittal

Professor Carl Bogus speaks to the Providence Journal about why the George Zimmerman verdict was the only possible outcome, in light of the evidence.

From the PROVIDENCE JOURNAL: In Providence, marchers denounce verdict in Trayvon Martin’s killing,” by Philip Marcelo, Journal Staff Writer

Professor Carl BogusPROVIDENCE, July 15, 2013 — The day after George Zimmerman was found not guilty in the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin in Florida, more than 150 residents and activists rallied and marched through Providence’s South Side in protest Sunday evening. […]

But Carl T. ‍Bogus, a law professor at Roger Williams University in Bristol, said the outcome was the only possible one, in light of the evidence.

The Florida prosecutors, he said, simply failed to prove Zimmerman’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

“The available evidence didn’t meet that standard. In fact, it wasn’t even close,” he said via e-mail. “Do I think that George Zimmerman was probably responsible for an innocent boy’s death? I do. Yet, had I been on the jury, I would have had to vote to acquit.” [...]

For full story, click here.