Professor Michael Burger in Huffington Post on an upcoming U.S. Supreme Court case that could make it harder for victims of hazardous pollutants to get justice.

Upcoming Events

Information Session

Information Session

Talk on U.N. Convention on Law of the Sea with Rear Admiral Steven D. Poulin
DEC
01
6:00 pm - 8:00 pm
Bay View Room - School of Law
Winter Solstice
DEC
02
5:30 pm - 7:30 pm
Bay View Room
Law Alumni Association Holiday Reception
DEC
03
5:30 pm - 7:30 pm
Citizens Plaza Rotunda
Marine Affairs Advisory Board Meeting
DEC
12
10:00 am - 2:00 pm
Bay View Room
Champions for Justice Dinner and Public Interest Auction
JAN
30
5:30 pm - 9:00 pm
Providence Biltmore Hotel

Trending@RWULaw

11/17/2014
By Dean Michael J. Yelnosky
As the shortest day of the year approaches, it can be uplifting to recall the long, bright days of summer. Just months ago, across practice settings and across the country, many of our students used...


Affordable Excellence at RWU LAW

Archives

Newsroom

Burger on Environmental Law

Professor Michael Burger in Huffington Post on an upcoming U.S. Supreme Court case that could make it harder for victims of hazardous pollutants to get justice.

From the HUFFINGTON POST:  “Supreme Court Could Make It Harder For Victims Of Hazardous Pollutants To Get Justice” by Lynne Peeples

ContaminationApril 16, 2014: […] Later this month, the Supreme Court will consider whether a federal environmental law that sets a different clock – one that starts ticking when a victim first learns of the contamination that likely caused his or her injury – should override the state law and allow the Asheville landowners' claims to move forward. CTS Corp. v. Waldburger turns on obscure legal terminology, but its implications for corporate America are significant. Big names are watching the case, including the American Chemistry Council, the National Association of Manufacturers, the American Coatings Association – and the U.S. Department of Justice.

Professor Michael Burger[…] Michael Burger, an expert in environmental law at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island, agrees with the landowners on this point.

"The report that ultimately led to the enactment of this part of CERCLA identified significant problems created for victims of toxic contamination by both statutes of limitations and statues of repose," Burger said, adding that Congress doesn't use the term "statute of repose" anywhere in its books. […]

Whichever way the Supreme Court rules, there could be potentially significant implications.

Burger suggested that a decision in favor of CTS would create "a perverse incentive" to pass statues of repose in states that want to lure certain types of industry. […]

For full story, click here.