Professor Michael Burger in Huffington Post on an upcoming U.S. Supreme Court case that could make it harder for victims of hazardous pollutants to get justice.

Upcoming Events

Commencement

Commencement

Open Door Speaker Series: Brand Protection as a Coordinated IP Strategy
MAR
02
5:00 pm - 6:00 pm
Bay View Room | Bristol Campus
New York City Info Session for Prospective Students
MAR
09
5:30 pm - 6:30 pm
The Ainsworth Midtown, 45 E 33rd Street, New York, NY 10016
New York City Law Alumni Reception
MAR
09
6:30 pm - 8:00 pm
Ainsworth Midtown
Accepted Students Day
MAR
25
10:00 am - 11:00 am
RWU Law Main Campus, 10 Metacom Avenue, Bristol, RI 02809
School of Law Commencement
MAY
19
1:00 pm - 3:00 pm
RWU School of Law, Bristol, RI

Trending@RWULaw

02/16/2017
By Katie Mulvaney
I have had the good fortune of covering the courts in Rhode Island for The Providence Journal since 2009. I relish the beat for both its emotional and legal elements. It keeps me engaged and...


Affordable Excellence at RWU LAW

Archives

Newsroom

Burger on Environmental Law

Professor Michael Burger in Huffington Post on an upcoming U.S. Supreme Court case that could make it harder for victims of hazardous pollutants to get justice.

From the HUFFINGTON POST:  “Supreme Court Could Make It Harder For Victims Of Hazardous Pollutants To Get Justice” by Lynne Peeples

ContaminationApril 16, 2014: […] Later this month, the Supreme Court will consider whether a federal environmental law that sets a different clock – one that starts ticking when a victim first learns of the contamination that likely caused his or her injury – should override the state law and allow the Asheville landowners' claims to move forward. CTS Corp. v. Waldburger turns on obscure legal terminology, but its implications for corporate America are significant. Big names are watching the case, including the American Chemistry Council, the National Association of Manufacturers, the American Coatings Association – and the U.S. Department of Justice.

Professor Michael Burger[…] Michael Burger, an expert in environmental law at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island, agrees with the landowners on this point.

"The report that ultimately led to the enactment of this part of CERCLA identified significant problems created for victims of toxic contamination by both statutes of limitations and statues of repose," Burger said, adding that Congress doesn't use the term "statute of repose" anywhere in its books. […]

Whichever way the Supreme Court rules, there could be potentially significant implications.

Burger suggested that a decision in favor of CTS would create "a perverse incentive" to pass statues of repose in states that want to lure certain types of industry. […]

For full story, click here.