Cited as a source by the ProJo's PolitiFact column, Professor Jared Goldstein weighs in on a Rhode Island law that appears to make lying a misdemeanor.

Upcoming Events

Open Door Speaker Series - The Traditional Side of Things

Sounding the Alarm on Mass Incarceration

Open Door Speaker Series - The Traditional Side of Things

Sounding the Alarm on Mass Incarceration

New York Area Info Session
MAR
05
5:00 pm - 6:00 pm
The Ainsworth, 122 West 26th Street (btw 6th & 7th), New York, NY
New York City Alumni Networking Reception
MAR
05
6:00 pm - 7:30 pm
The Ainsworth, 122 West 26th Street (btw 6th & 7th), New York, NY
360°of a Large Corporate Deal
MAR
19
5:00 pm - 7:00 pm
RWU Law | Bristol, Rhode Island
Accepted Students Day
MAR
21
9:00 am - 3:15 pm
RWU Law, 10 Metacom Avenue, Bristol, RI 02809
Sounding the Alarm on Mass Incarceration - Moving Beyond the Problem and Toward Solutions
MAR
27
8:00 am - 4:30 pm
RWU School of Law, Bristol, Rhode Island

Trending@RWULaw

03/02/2015
By Kathryn Thompson
Excellent lawyers are committed to lifelong learning; our craft requires it.  Whenever a new client walks into a lawyer’s office, that lawyer faces a new challenge. This challenge always...


Affordable Excellence at RWU LAW

Archives

Newsroom

Goldstein on 'Anti-Lying' Law

Cited as a source by the ProJo's PolitiFact column, Professor Jared Goldstein weighs in on a Rhode Island law that appears to make lying a misdemeanor.

From the PROVIDENCE JOURNAL: "You are now, mostly, free to lie on the Internet" by C. EUGENE EMERY JR. JOURNAL STAFF WRITER
   
June 25, 2012: [...] previously, you could have faced misdemeanor charges in Rhode Island, if you believe state Rep. Christopher Blazejewski, a Providence Democrat. On June 12, he told the Rhode Island House that it was illegal to transmit a lie on the Internet, on radio, on TV, or over the phone about anything.

Professor Jared Goldstein[...] Jared Goldstein, a law professor at Roger Williams University School of Law, said the plain language of the law did “indeed appear to make it a crime to knowingly or intentionally send any false information over the Internet, without any limitation on the context or subject matter. If read literally, the language would seem to cover giving false information on a dating site. Or lying to a friend in an e-mail message. Or maybe even clicking ‘Like’ for a friend’s photo that you don’t really like.

“If the provision is read in that literal way,” he said, “it would almost certainly be unconstitutionally overbroad because it would prohibit a huge amount of constitutionally-protected speech. Even if it is not read that way, but construed narrowly to cover only false information that can constitutionally be prohibited, the law may still be unconstitutionally vague, because it doesn’t clearly tell the public what is prohibited.” [...]

For full story, click here.