Professor Andrew Horwitz tells the Providence Journal why a Rhode Island Superior Court "judge-shopping" decision doesn't reflect the reality of lawyers' roles.

Upcoming Events

Open Door Speaker Series

Open Door Speaker Series

February Open House
FEB
17
5:30 pm - 8:30 pm
RWU Law, 10 Metacom Avenue, Bristol, RI 02809
Washington, D.C. Area Info Session for Prospective Students
FEB
22
5:00 pm - 6:00 pm
Gordon Biersch Brewery Restaurant, Marzen Room, 900 F Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20004
Washington, D.C. Law Alumni Networking Reception
FEB
22
6:00 pm - 7:30 pm
Gordon Biersch Brewery Restaurant, Marzen Room, 900 F Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20004
Marine Affairs Coffee & Conversation
FEB
23
3:30 pm - 4:30 pm
RWU Law - Room 244 (Dean Logan Conference Room)
Resume and Cover Letter Review
FEB
24
9:00 am - 4:00 pm
Career Development, Suite 175

Trending@RWULaw

02/09/2016
By Tanya Monestier
In January 2014, I taught Conflict of Laws for the first time at RWU Law.  As part of my preparation, I encountered what seemed to be a throwaway sentence in a study aid that said something to...


Affordable Excellence at RWU LAW

Archives

Newsroom

Horwitz on 'Judge-Shopping' Decision

Professor Andrew Horwitz tells the Providence Journal why a Rhode Island Superior Court "judge-shopping" decision doesn't reflect the reality of lawyers' roles.

From the PROVIDENCE JOURNAL: "Lawyers denounce R.I. Superior Court Judge Lanphear’s directive to divulge plea agreements," by Katie Mulvaney, Journal Staff Writer

PROVIDENCE, August 28, 2014: The criminal defense community expressed outrage this week over a court decision chastising two lawyers for “judge shopping” in their handling of a drug dealer’s criminal case.

Professor Andrew HorwitzPublic Defender Mary S. McElroy and Andrew Horwitz, director of the criminal defense clinic at the Roger Williams University School of Law, are among the members of the state criminal defense bar to take the unusual step of publicly faulting Superior Court Judge Jeffrey A. Lanphear’s blistering Aug. 15 ruling as overreaching, off base and lacking in understanding about the lawyers’ roles in the judicial process. [...]

“One of the things I found most disturbing about this decision is that it displays a fundamental misunderstanding about the role of the defense lawyer…,” Horwitz said. “The lawyer is duty-bound not to reveal things that would harm his or her client so Judge Lanphear’s suggestion that silence somehow represents lack of candor is totally unfair.”

For full story, click here.