Professor Andrew Horwitz tells the Providence Journal why a Rhode Island Superior Court "judge-shopping" decision doesn't reflect the reality of lawyers' roles.

Upcoming Events

Open Door Speaker Series - The Traditional Side of Things

Sounding the Alarm on Mass Incarceration

Open Door Speaker Series - The Traditional Side of Things

Sounding the Alarm on Mass Incarceration

New York Area Info Session
MAR
05
5:00 pm - 6:00 pm
The Ainsworth, 122 West 26th Street (btw 6th & 7th), New York, NY
New York City Alumni Networking Reception
MAR
05
6:00 pm - 7:30 pm
The Ainsworth, 122 West 26th Street (btw 6th & 7th), New York, NY
360°of a Large Corporate Deal
MAR
19
5:00 pm - 7:00 pm
RWU Law | Bristol, Rhode Island
Accepted Students Day
MAR
21
9:00 am - 3:15 pm
RWU Law, 10 Metacom Avenue, Bristol, RI 02809

Trending@RWULaw

02/24/2015
By Professor Emily Sack
On the evening of January 15, 2015, Oklahoma prisoner Charles Warner died by lethal injection, shortly after the Supreme Court denied his application for a stay of execution.  Warner had also...


Affordable Excellence at RWU LAW

Archives

Newsroom

Horwitz on 'Judge-Shopping' Decision

Professor Andrew Horwitz tells the Providence Journal why a Rhode Island Superior Court "judge-shopping" decision doesn't reflect the reality of lawyers' roles.

From the PROVIDENCE JOURNAL: "Lawyers denounce R.I. Superior Court Judge Lanphear’s directive to divulge plea agreements," by Katie Mulvaney, Journal Staff Writer

PROVIDENCE, August 28, 2014: The criminal defense community expressed outrage this week over a court decision chastising two lawyers for “judge shopping” in their handling of a drug dealer’s criminal case.

Professor Andrew HorwitzPublic Defender Mary S. McElroy and Andrew Horwitz, director of the criminal defense clinic at the Roger Williams University School of Law, are among the members of the state criminal defense bar to take the unusual step of publicly faulting Superior Court Judge Jeffrey A. Lanphear’s blistering Aug. 15 ruling as overreaching, off base and lacking in understanding about the lawyers’ roles in the judicial process. [...]

“One of the things I found most disturbing about this decision is that it displays a fundamental misunderstanding about the role of the defense lawyer…,” Horwitz said. “The lawyer is duty-bound not to reveal things that would harm his or her client so Judge Lanphear’s suggestion that silence somehow represents lack of candor is totally unfair.”

For full story, click here.