Professor Niki Kuckes discusses Rhode Island ruling that affidavits or expert testimony supporting counsel fee motion must come from lawyer not involved in case.

Upcoming Events

Welcome to the LAA for New Graduates Post-Bar Exam Reception
JUL
27
5:00 pm - 7:00 pm
Birch Bar (Westin Boston Waterfront)
19th Annual Rhode Island Attorney General Open Government Summit
JUL
28
8:30 am - 12:00 pm
RWU School of Law, Bristol, RI
Incoming Student Orientation
AUG
09
All Day
RWU School of Law
18th Annual LAA Scholarship Golf Tournament
AUG
19
12:00 pm - 8:00 pm
Swansea Country Club, Swansea, MA

Trending@RWULaw

07/10/2017
By Dean Michael J. Yelnosky
When I talk to prospective students about RWU Law I have lots to say, but I don’t spend too much time talking about our faculty’s teaching because all law schools say they have great teachers, and...


Affordable Excellence at RWU LAW

Archives

Newsroom

Kuckes on Legal Fees Ruling

Professor Niki Kuckes discusses Rhode Island ruling that affidavits or expert testimony supporting counsel fee motion must come from lawyer not involved in case.

From Rhode Island Lawyers Weekly:Bar: ruling on fee motions to add expense, complexity” by Sheri Qualters

Legal feesJuly 20, 2016: A recent state Supreme Court decision finding that affidavits or testimony supporting counsel fee motions should come from a Rhode Island bar member who is not part of the case brings clarity and consistency to the process but also makes it more costly and complicated, practitioners say.

The Supreme Court vacated Superior Court Judge Bennett R. Gallo’s decision to award plaintiff Tri-Town Construction Co. $43,227.25 in attorneys’ fees in a case involving a loan for a real estate development deal. In remanding the plaintiff’s case against developer Commerce Park Associates 12 LL and manager Nicholas E. Cambio, the court directed Gallo to consider the testimony or affidavit of an independent lawyer about the reasonableness and necessity of Tri-Town’s fees.

Professor Niki Kuckes[…] The opinion, which cites Florida and Vermont case law, places Rhode Island on the restrictive end of the spectrum in terms of how much leeway judges have to evaluate fee applications, said Niki Kuckes, a professor at Roger Williams University School of Law who has studied counsel fees.

Litigants would not need expert testimony in a comparable case in Rhode Island federal court, according to 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals standards, she said.

“Rhode Island has taken the view that that’s not proper for the judge to bring his or her own expertise to bear,” Kuckes said. “Other jurisdictions say it is proper.”

[…] The requirement for an expert opinion about a fee application increases the likelihood that an opposing party will hire its own expert to weigh in, which would add an additional layer of complexity to the process, Kuckes said.

“[The rule] is not appropriate to every occasion in which fees are sought. It can be appropriate for a very large, complex case that spans a number of years, but not necessarily for a small, routine contract dispute,” she said.

For full story, click here.