The U.S. Supreme Court declined to stay BP's obligation to pay claims related to the Gulf oil spill during appeal. Dean David Logan discusses the implications.

Upcoming Events

Champions for Justice

Best Wishes from RWU Law

Champions for Justice

Best Wishes from RWU Law

LSAT Free Practice Test
JAN
13
10:00 am - 1:30 pm
RWU Law Experiential Campus, 1 Empire Street, 4th Floor, Providence, RI 02903
Champions for Justice
JAN
27
All Day
Omni Providence Hotel
’It’s Just a Building’ – The Role of a Lawyer in Real Estate Development
FEB
16
5:00 pm - 6:00 pm
RWU Law, 10 Metacom Avenue, Bristol - Room 262
Washington, DC Area Info Session for Prospective Students
FEB
21
5:30 pm - 6:00 pm
Renaissance Washington, DC Dupont Circle Hotel
RWU Law Alumni Reception
FEB
21
6:00 pm - 7:30 pm
Renaissance Washington, DC Dupont Circle Hotel

Trending@RWULaw

11/16/2016
By Deborah Johnson
Last week – just hours after the next President of the United States of America was announced – RWU Law students, faculty and staff (joined by undergraduates and University faculty and staff)...


Affordable Excellence at RWU LAW

Archives

Newsroom

Logan on BP Settlement Payments

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to stay BP's obligation to pay claims related to the Gulf oil spill during appeal. Dean David Logan discusses the implications.

From the NEW ORLEANS ADVOCATE: "Supreme Court: BP must pay claims during appeal" by Richard Thompson

BP oil spillNEW ORLEANS, June 09, 2014: British oil giant BP will have to continue paying claims from its multibillion-dollar oil spill settlement while it tries to convince the U.S. Supreme Court to tighten the rules governing which businesses can get money.

BP had asked the nation’s highest court to issue a stay on those claims while it pursued its appeal of a lower court ruling. But the court declined that request on Monday without comment.

That, by the company’s own reckoning, means sums totaling hundreds of millions of dollars may continue to flow over the next few months to businesses claiming a loss of income after the 2010 spill.

And it doesn’t bode well for the company’s argument overall, according to some legal experts. If the court thought BP had a decent case, the thinking goes, it would have issued the stay, knowing that it would be difficult to recoup the money after it has already been paid out.

“This certainly doesn’t suggest that this is a compelling case for the court to hear full argument on,” said David Logan, dean of the law school at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island. [...]

For full story, click here.