Professor Peter Margulies explains why a new federal court decision signals that "the criminal justice system is a viable option in terrorism cases.”

Upcoming Events

Open Door Speaker Series

Commencement

Open Door Speaker Series

Commencement

Reception in Memory of Professor Robert B. Kent '01H
APR
29
4:30 pm - 6:00 pm
RWU School of Law | Bristol, Rhode Island
Providence Law Alumni Networking Reception
APR
30
5:30 pm - 7:00 pm
GPub, 61 Orange Street, Providence, RI
Accepted Students Day
MAY
11
9:45 am - 1:30 pm
RWU Law, 10 Metacom Avenue, Bristol, RI 02809
School of Law Commencement
MAY
15
1:00 pm - 3:00 pm
RWU School of Law, Bristol, RI
Pro Bon Collaboarate Cocktail Reception
MAY
28
5:30 pm - 7:00 pm
One Citizens Plaza Rotunda, Providence, RI

Trending@RWULaw

04/14/2015
By Dennis Esposito
As I sit here in sunny Mexico, I ask myself: Why do I go back?  Here’s why: I am reflecting upon my longstanding relationship with the Marine Affairs Institute...  Seventeen years and...


Affordable Excellence at RWU LAW

Archives

Newsroom

New York Times Cites Margulies on Terror

Professor Peter Margulies explains why a new federal court decision signals that "the criminal justice system is a viable option in terrorism cases.”

A New York Times article titled, "Judge Refuses to Dismiss Terror Suspect’s Case" by Benjamin Wesier, cites RWU Law Professor Peter Margulies:

NEW YORK, July 13, 2010: At the heart of the debate about where and how to prosecute the men accused of being terrorists who have been held at Guantánamo Bay has been the fear among many that the suspects, tried in a civilian court, would benefit from rights and protections they did not deserve.

The detainees, the concern was, would argue that they had been tortured, and that their cases should be dismissed.

One of them, Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, who last year became the first Guantánamo detainee to actually be moved into the civilian court system, has argued that his nearly five years in detention before that had deprived him of a fundamental protection afforded all defendants in a federal court: the right to a speedy trial.

On Tuesday, a federal judge in Manhattan rejected Mr. Ghailani’s claim, and cleared the way for federal prosecutors to try him for his suspected role in Al Qaeda’s 1998 bombings of embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.

Professor Peter MarguliesThe judge’s ruling is destined to further shape the debate about whether to try Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and others accused of being 9/11 conspirators, in civilian court.

[...]

Peter Margulies, a law professor at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island and an expert in national security law, said Judge Kaplan made clear he did not want to compel the government to have to choose upfront between detaining and trying suspected terrorists.

“Forcing a choice might actually discourage reliance on the criminal justice system,” Professor Margulies said.

He said by taking a “flexible, pragmatic approach,” the judge was saying that detentions and trials “are not mutually exclusive, and the criminal justice system is a viable option in terrorism cases.”

[...]

Read full story here.