Professor Peter Margulies explains why a new federal court decision signals that "the criminal justice system is a viable option in terrorism cases.”

Upcoming Events

Champions For Justice

Sounding the Alarm on Mass Incarceration

Champions For Justice

Sounding the Alarm on Mass Incarceration

Champions for Justice Dinner and Public Interest Auction
JAN
30
5:00 pm - 9:00 pm
Providence Biltmore Hotel
Conversation with U.S. Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli, Jr.
FEB
04
10:30 am - 11:30 am
RWU Law Appellate Courtroom 283
Master the Basics of Spinal Radiology
FEB
04
5:30 pm - 8:30 pm
Sheraton Providence Airport Hotel
Behind Closed Doors
FEB
11
7:00 pm - 8:30 pm
Appellate Courtroom - Room 283
Washington, DC Law Alumni Reception
FEB
24
6:00 pm - 7:30 pm
Marriott Washington at Metro Center, 775 12th Street NW, Washington, DC

Trending@RWULaw

01/26/2015
By Professor Jared Goldstein
On Wednesday, February 4, 2015, I’ll be interviewing Donald Verrilli, Jr., the Solicitor General of the United States, in an event that’s been billed as a “Fireside Chat.” Those looking to find...


Affordable Excellence at RWU LAW

Archives

Newsroom

New York Times Cites Margulies on Terror

Professor Peter Margulies explains why a new federal court decision signals that "the criminal justice system is a viable option in terrorism cases.”

A New York Times article titled, "Judge Refuses to Dismiss Terror Suspect’s Case" by Benjamin Wesier, cites RWU Law Professor Peter Margulies:

NEW YORK, July 13, 2010: At the heart of the debate about where and how to prosecute the men accused of being terrorists who have been held at Guantánamo Bay has been the fear among many that the suspects, tried in a civilian court, would benefit from rights and protections they did not deserve.

The detainees, the concern was, would argue that they had been tortured, and that their cases should be dismissed.

One of them, Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, who last year became the first Guantánamo detainee to actually be moved into the civilian court system, has argued that his nearly five years in detention before that had deprived him of a fundamental protection afforded all defendants in a federal court: the right to a speedy trial.

On Tuesday, a federal judge in Manhattan rejected Mr. Ghailani’s claim, and cleared the way for federal prosecutors to try him for his suspected role in Al Qaeda’s 1998 bombings of embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.

Professor Peter MarguliesThe judge’s ruling is destined to further shape the debate about whether to try Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and others accused of being 9/11 conspirators, in civilian court.

[...]

Peter Margulies, a law professor at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island and an expert in national security law, said Judge Kaplan made clear he did not want to compel the government to have to choose upfront between detaining and trying suspected terrorists.

“Forcing a choice might actually discourage reliance on the criminal justice system,” Professor Margulies said.

He said by taking a “flexible, pragmatic approach,” the judge was saying that detentions and trials “are not mutually exclusive, and the criminal justice system is a viable option in terrorism cases.”

[...]

Read full story here.