Professor Andrew Horwitz spoke to the ProJo about Ferguson, Mo., grand jury decision not to indict a white police officer in fatal shooting of an unarmed black teenager.

Upcoming Events

Best Wishes

Best Wishes

Free Practice LSAT Test
JAN
12
10:00 am - 1:30 pm
RWU Law- Experiential Campus, 1 Empire Street, 4th Floor, Providence, RI 02903
Martin Luther King, Jr. Celebration Keynote Address
JAN
18
4:00 pm - 8:00 pm
RWU Law | Bristol Campus
Info Session for Prospective Students (1/19/18)
JAN
19
9:30 am - 1:00 pm
RWU Law- Main Campus, 10 Metacom Avenue, Bristol, RI 02809
Champions for Justice
JAN
26
6:00 pm - 9:30 pm
Omni Providence Hotel
Info Session for Prospective Students (2/16/18)
FEB
16
9:30 am - 1:00 pm
RWU Law- Main Campus, 10 Metacom Avenue, Bristol, RI 02809

Trending@RWULaw

12/01/2017
By Dean Michael J. Yelnosky
Whenever possible, I try not to simply assert that the program at RWU Law is special.  Instead I try to give specific examples, preferably “objective” examples, or examples that do not come from...


Affordable Excellence at RWU LAW

Archives

Newsroom

ProJo: Horwitz on Ferguson

Professor Andrew Horwitz spoke to the ProJo about Ferguson, Mo., grand jury decision not to indict a white police officer in fatal shooting of an unarmed black teenager.

From the PROVIDENCE JOURNAL:Trial would have value in Ferguson” by Edward Fitzpatrick, Journal Columnist

Ferguson riotsNovember 30, 2014: When it comes to race and justice in the United States, it seems we never fail to fail. […]

Usually, prosecutors “present evidence selectively in a way that is designed to achieve their goal,” Roger Williams University School of Law professor Andrew Horwitz said. But in this case, the prosecutor presented all the evidence to the grand jury, including contradictory evidence, and made no recommendation about whether it amounted to “probable cause” to justify a charge. […]

Professor Andrew HorwitzHorwitz said the public would likely have had more confidence in the outcome if the matter had gone to trial. “With daily coverage of a trial, everyone could look at and listen to the actual evidence in the case and make their own determination about whether the process seemed fair,” he said. By contrast, the grand jury process “is conducted in secret, and people have to have faith — or not — that the outcome is justice.”

Not only is a grand jury secret, it’s also “an unregulated environment, run entirely by the prosecution — a one-sided affair,” Horwitz said. By contrast, a trial is overseen by a judge who can make rulings on evidence, and it’s an adversarial process, in which attorneys can cross-examine witnesses, he said.

Horwitz, director of the law school’s Criminal Defense Clinic, said the grand jury process usually “plays out poorly for the defendant.” But in this case, the grand jury voted against bringing any charges against the officer.

For full story, click here.