Professor Michael Yelnosky is cited in the Providence Journal explaining why, in some private workplaces, watching employees with a surveillance camera is allowed.

Upcoming Events

Santoro Series

Alumni Weekend

Santoro Series

Alumni Weekend

Public Interest Potluck
SEP
05
5:30 pm - 7:30 pm
Providence
Info Session for Prospective Students
SEP
15
8:30 am - 12:00 pm
RWU Law, 10 Metacom Avenue, Bristol, RI 02809
3rd Annual Professor Anthony J. Santoro Business Law Lecture Series
SEP
18
5:00 pm - 7:30 pm
Omni Hotel Providence
15th Annual Law Alumni Association Scholarship Golf Tournament
SEP
28
12:00 pm - 8:00 pm
Metacomet Country Club, 500 Veterans Memorial Parkway, East Providence

Trending@RWULaw

09/02/2014
By Michael W. Donnelly-Boylen
On Wednesday, August 13th we welcomed the Class of 2017 to RWU Law.  This is the 13th class I have had the privilege to admit to the School of Law and each one brings its own unique character (...


Affordable Excellence at RWU LAW

Archives

Newsroom

Yelnosky on Workplace Privacy

Professor Michael Yelnosky is cited in the Providence Journal explaining why, in some private workplaces, watching employees with a surveillance camera is allowed.

From the PROVIDENCE JOURNAL: "PolitiFact: Privacy has its limitations" by C. Eugene Emery Jr., Journal Staff Writer

Privacy rightsFebruary 17, 2013: [...] Rep. Brian Patrick Kennedy, a Democrat from Hopkinton, wants to put some limitations on how much private information you must reveal if you apply for a job or enroll in a school. [...] It was this sentence in his news release that caught our eye, particularly the reference to employer rights: “Employers and schools have no more right to this private information than they do in providing surveillance of a dorm room or a worker’s cubicle.”

[...] Is it legal to monitor workers that way?

“In some workplaces, the answer is pretty clearly yes,” said Michael Yelnosky, who specializes in labor law at Roger Williams University School of Law. In a private workplace with no union, placing a surveillance camera is no different from having a supervisor sit behind the worker and watch everything, he said.

“It might come out differently if there’s a union in place,” he said. “The employer would have to bargain that issue before he went ahead and unilaterally made that change” because it would be a change in working conditions.

The rules are a bit different if the employer is the government, he said. “The Supreme Court has said you have some protections in the workplace against your public employer that you wouldn’t have from your private employer because the Constitution prohibits some state invasions of privacy where it doesn’t say anything about private employers.” [...]

For full story, click here.